Overview · Clients · Arquitectura Financiera Integral

Arquitectura Financiera Integral

AFI = personal-finance consulting + companion app for Mexican clients. Founders Marianita + Violeta. Live site at arquitecturafinancieraintegral.com (Netlify). Direct Spark Automations client — invoicing + commercial flows do NOT route through Horus. Marianita is a friend of Pablo's; equity / partnership upside is on the table — proposal is friend-rate, not a market quote. Kicked off Apr 26; site diagnostic delivered Apr 27; SA proposal v2 (friend rate $1,500) drafted Apr 28 in response to a third-party developer quote ($2,000) AFI received in parallel.

Kickoff
2026-04-26
2 days in · charter + folder seeded
Proposal v1
drafted
$1,500 friend rate · awaiting Pablo review before send
Kickoff target
2026-06-16
post-RUBISCO2 demo · launch Sep 8
Client portal
live
afi-portal.html (Marianita-facing)

Esta semana auto · scripts/weekly_client_refresh.py

Bloque regenerado los lunes 07:30 PdC desde el event log de los últimos 7 días.

Current state 2026-04-28

Active workstreams

1 · Companion appPersonal-finance app for AFI clients. SA proposal v1 drafted — see "Proposals" below. Pre-engagement; nothing built.
2 · Acquisition + onboarding flowOut-of-scope for proposal v1 (deferred to Phase 4 add-on). To be re-scoped after app build commits.
3 · Site diagnosticDELIVERED 2026-04-27 — full report at Spark Automations/Clients/Arquitectura Financiera Integral/diagnostico/2026-04-27-site-review.md. Headline: result-screen CTA is dead button (primary conversion leak), PWA broken, SEO floor absent. Implement-vs-handoff still open per decisions §7.

Proposals v1 + comparison

2026-04-28DocumentStatusOne-liner
Spark Automations v1 afi-proposal.html drafted v2 $1,500 USD friend rate · 12 work-weeks across Q3 2026 · solo Pablo (LLM-augmented) · PWA + Supabase + Vercel + Belvo. V1 below Ley Fintech ITF/IFPE line. Code in AFI's GitHub from week 1. 60 days post-launch support included. 11 sections + 4 appendices. v1 was built against a $90k figure Gemini hallucinated from the dev quote — fully retracted; v2 reflects the real $2k baseline + friend pricing intent.
Third-party dev quote Propuesta.pdf (Drive) · local copy received $2,000 USD · 10 weeks · solo (Gabriel Lazo, La Rioja, Argentina) · React Native + Expo + Supabase. Modules: Smart Dashboard, Plan de Vida, Investment Simulator (S&P/CETES), Debt Restructuring, 6-month reports. No Belvo (manual entry implied), no Ley Fintech analysis, no CONDUSEF / LFPDPPP framing.

Side-by-side comparison lives inside the SA proposal as Appendix D. Local PDF copy of the dev quote is pending — Drive sharing currently restricted on Spark's service-account side; Pablo to drop into Spark Automations/Clients/Arquitectura Financiera Integral/proposals/ manually OR Spark extends Cloud Run with a Drive-download endpoint.

Regulatory posture V1 stays below the Ley Fintech line

The dev quote excludes all CNBV / CONDUSEF / Ley Fintech work. SA's proposal scopes V1 deliberately below the regulatory line and names which features WOULD cross it (so V1.5 conversations are honest). Tier 2 — verified against Ley Fintech (Ley para Regular las Instituciones de Tecnología Financiera, 2018). Final clearance is AFI counsel's call.

FrameworkV1 posture
LFPDPPP (data protection)Aviso de privacidad template included (proposal Appendix C). Data export + deletion endpoints. Counsel review before publication.
Ley Fintech / CNBV (ITF/IFPE)V1 is read-only Belvo + dashboard + check-in. No money movement, no wallet, no SPEI, no e-money. AFI remains an unregulated educational + advisory entity.
CONDUSEFDisclaimer language for "AFI is not a regulated financial institution; this app provides educational visualization, not financial advice in the regulated sense." UNE designation flagged as future requirement if asset thresholds ever crossed.

Decisions waiting on Pablo before send

Pricing posture friend rate $1,500 (current draft) vs go lower vs $0 + equity-only — Pablo's call
open
Equity / partnership conversation parallel stream with Diego — separate doc when ready, NOT embedded in build proposal
open
AFI methodology indicators required from Marianita in Phase 0 — needs explicit ask
open
Send proposal to Marianita + Violeta URL = /clients/afi-proposal.html (auth'd via Cloudflare Worker)
awaiting Pablo
Site diagnostic — implement vs hand off decisions §7
open

Commercial SA-direct

Routing SA-direct, NOT via Horus
locked
Payment vehicle Pablo's personal Nu México (CLABE 638180010162793045) for kickoff payment; corporate routing deferred
interim
Diego intro Marianita open · pending Violeta confirm · Diego owns scheduling
pending
SAT regime / corporate org part of broader SAT decision (decisions §1)
deferred

Timeline if proposal is accepted 12 weeks from Jun 16

PhaseWindowOutcomeDemo gate
0 — SetupMay 5 → Jun 15Contract + 40% wire ($36k); accounts (Belvo sandbox, Vercel, Supabase, Apple/Play); AFI methodology v1 content drafted; GitHub repo bootstrapped in AFI's orgKickoff call
1 — Design + Belvo protoJun 16 → Jul 6End-to-end Belvo connection in sandbox; UI shell w/ all 8 user-story screens at low fidelity; AFI dashboard wired to mock dataBelvo demo
2 — MVP buildJul 7 → Aug 17All 8 user stories live against live Belvo sandbox; coach view; push notifications; RLS audit passedFunctional MVP demo
3 — UAT + bug fixAug 18 → Aug 3110–20 AFI client beta users on production; counsel review of LFPDPPP aviso; CONDUSEF disclaimer lockedBeta sign-off
4 — Launch + handoverSep 1 → Sep 8Production launch; 3-hr AFI team training; full doc handover; 30-day warranty startsLaunch

Why Jun 16: Pablo's RUBISCO2 hotels demo is Jun 9. Starting AFI earlier would split attention. Stated upfront in §7 of the proposal.

Files on disk

PathWhat's there
Spark Automations/Clients/Arquitectura Financiera Integral/CLAUDE.mdClient charter — founders, business, role, commercial, open tasks, hard rules
Clients/Arquitectura Financiera Integral/meetings/Meeting notes, dated YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>.md
Clients/Arquitectura Financiera Integral/diagnostico/Site diagnostic deliverables. Latest: 2026-04-27-site-review.md
Clients/Arquitectura Financiera Integral/proposals/Proposals + 3rd-party quotes for comparison. (Dev quote PDF pending local copy.)
Spark Automations/Internal/clients/afi-proposal.htmlSA proposal v1 (this site, behind Cloudflare Worker auth)
Spark Automations/Internal/clients/afi.htmlThis page (internal status, Pablo-facing)
Spark Automations/Internal/clients/afi-portal.htmlMarianita-facing client portal

Hard rules never violate

SA-direct routing invoicing + commercial flows do NOT go through Horus
hard rule
No internal cost surfacing in client docs Diego is being introduced as partner; protect cost structure
hard rule
Site diagnostic must be Pablo-triggered do NOT auto-run
hard rule
Proposals never sent without Pablo's "send it" draft → show → wait — applies to AFI like every client
hard rule